Of IOM, IT, EMRs, patient safety, and quality

 

If your doctor’s not looking you in the eye quite as much as he or she used to, it may be partially the fault of the Institute of Medicine (IOM).

In 1999, the IOM published a report entitled “To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System,” which famously concluded that preventable medical errors cause up to 98,000 patient deaths annually. This was followed by the 2001 report, “Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century.” These reports touted, among other things, the power of health information technology (IT), including Electronic Medical Records (EMRs), to reduce medical errors, increase patient safety, and increase the quality of medical care. Subsequently, the federal government has stepped in, providing financial incentives for physicians who can demonstrate “meaningful use” of an EMR, and will soon be imposing financial penalties on those physicians who don’t climb onto the EMR bandwagon. Thus, the IOM is directly or indirectly responsible if your doctor isn’t looking you in the eye because she’s gazing into a computer screen instead.

Upon what evidence did the IOM base its assertion that EMR’s would improve safety and quality? Well … you know … it’s just kinda obvious, isn’t it? I mean, after all, it’s technology, and it’s gotta be better than paper, and it just makes sense that using more technology is better, right?

In fact, there was no data to suggest that health IT would improve either the quality or the safety of medical care. In the intervening years, as health IT implementation has exploded, there continues to be a paucity of data to suggest that health IT improves either the quality or the safety of medical care. There is good data that it introduces new errors and quality problems into health care.

Last month the IOM released a new report, calling for the formation of an independent federal body to investigate patient deaths and other adverse events caused by … drumroll, please … health information technology.

Dr. Richard I. Cook, an associate professor of anesthesia and critical care at the University of Chicago, said, “It’s not surprising that such adverse events are being found related to health IT, and it’s not surprising that those promoting these systems have neither looked for them nor anticipated them. To make large-scale investments in these systems and only now be looking at the impact on patient safety borders on recklessness.” Dr. Scot M. Silverstein, a consultant in medical informatics at the Drexel University College of Information Science and Technology in Pennsylvania, said that it is “unethical” to expand health IT so dramatically without understanding the precise nature of the risks it poses to patients.

“Reckless” … “unethical” …

Meanwhile, my doctor’s still not looking me in the eye because he’s trying to find something in the computer. Sheesh! This is quality improvement?? Have we simply created a new “Quality chasm”?

 

(The quotes above are from this story which was published in the AMA news.)

3
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
2 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
Tech NewsScot Silverstein, MDScot Silverstein, MD Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Scot Silverstein, MD
Guest

Let me even be more clear:

There is no ethical excuse for insertion of technology of unknown risk (per recent IOM report) into healthcare or other life-critical settings, no matter what we THINK it will do, other than the excuses of gambling and/or experimentation.

There are very strong guidelines for human subjects experimentation, and informed consent is mandatory in those guidelines, such as here: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/hs/ethical_guidelines.htm

Scot Silverstein, MD
Guest

See my site at http://www.ischool.drexel.edu/faculty/ssilverstein/cases/ , and my writing since 2004 at http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com as “InformaticsMD” for more on these issues.

Tech News
Guest

do you support the use of EMR’s I like to stay up to date all new tech related news.